The New York Times (December 14, 2011) has a good article on Alvin Plantinga's new book, in which he argues that the true enemy of modern science is not theistic religion but metaphysical naturalism.
Plantinga's scholarship is a remarkable achievement in making a philosophical case for biblical religion, which goes against the grain of modern analytic philosophy's tendency to take atheism for granted.
As I have indicated in a previous post, Plantinga's argument depends on taking a theistic evolutionist position that assumes the truth of Darwinian evolutionary science, while arguing that biblical theism provides support for that science.
I have indicated why I find his argumentation unpersuasive. But what is most interesting about his reasoning is how biblical believers need to accept evolutionary science in arguing that science and religion are compatible.
Thus, Plantinga belongs to a long tradition of theistic evolutionists that includes people like C. S. Lewis, Pope John Paul II, Francis Collins, and Michael Behe.
My understanding is that the Abrahamic religions hold that humans are spiritual creatures, and as a consequence know that God exists, but many refuse to acknowledge this truth because humans are been born into a state of sin and so tend to resist God's authority. That implies atheism is due to poor motivation, rather than an intellectual error. Do I have this right?
ReplyDelete--Les Brunswick