Darwinian Conservatism by Larry Arnhart

Traditionalist conservatives and classical liberals need Charles Darwin. They need him because a Darwinian science of human nature supports Burkean conservatives and Lockean liberals in their realist view of human imperfectibility, and in their commitment to ordered liberty as rooted in natural desires, cultural traditions, and prudential judgments. Arnhart's email address is larnhart1@niu.edu.

Friday, October 29, 2010

John West's God

›
Here I add to my previous post on John West's article in The Intercollegiate Review . At the end of The Origin of Species , Darwin write...
Wednesday, October 27, 2010

John West in "The Intercollegiate Review"

›
The Fall 2010 issue of The Intercollegiate Review has two articles on the debate over Darwinian conservatism. My article is entitled "...
2 comments:
Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Plato in China

›
Whenever I speak with professors of philosophy, I am often surprised by how many of them embrace a Platonic rationalism in their thinking, p...
2 comments:

Conference on Science and Virtue, Nov. 4-5

›
Peter Augustine Lawler and Marc Guerra are directing a series of conferences on "Science and Virtue." The first conference will be...
1 comment:
Thursday, October 14, 2010

Arnhart in China

›
Today, I will be travelling to China for 10 days. I will be part of a conference in Beijing on "Evolution and Ethics," which will ...
6 comments:
Friday, October 08, 2010

Philippa Foot, 1920-2010

›
Philippa Foot died a few days ago on her 90th birthday. As I explained in a post that I wrote last spring, I see her arguments for the hypo...

Aristotle's Darwinian Ethics (8): Existential Friendship

›
In previous posts, I have suggested that what Aristotle calls "friendship" ( philia ) corresponds to what David Hume, Adam Smith, ...
Friday, October 01, 2010

Aristotle's Darwinian Ethics (7): Friendship & Sympathy

›
The longest section of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics is devoted to "friendship" ( philia ) (books 8-9). For Aristotle, ...
1 comment:
Monday, September 27, 2010

Aristotle's Darwinian Ethics (6): Hare on Aristotle's Platonic Religion

›
As a proponent of the divine command theory of ethics, John Hare (a professor at Yale University) criticizes my Darwinian ethics for not rec...
3 comments:
Friday, September 24, 2010

Aristotle's Darwinian Ethics (5): Animal Psychology and Pleasure

›
Darwin argues that human beings differ from other animals in degree but not in kind. This is often thought to be a refutation of Aristotelia...
Monday, September 20, 2010

Aristotle's Darwinian Ethics (4): Natural Right and Biology

›
One of the most famous--and enigmatic--passages in Aristotle's writings is his account of natural right (or natural justice) in Book 5 o...
1 comment:
Saturday, September 18, 2010

Free Will and Dilley's Secrecy

›
In Stephen Dilley's APSA conference paper, he writes: This essay proposes that Arnhart's conservatism fails for a more fundamental r...
5 comments:
Friday, September 17, 2010

The Question of Free Will: Stephen Dilley's Reply

›
Recently, I wrote a post on Stephen Dilley's argument that I deny free will and thus endorse a determinism that would make moral respon...
1 comment:
Sunday, September 12, 2010

Aristotle's Darwinian Ethics (3): Holloway on Courage and Nobility

›
About 15 years ago, I taught my graduate seminar on "Evolution and Political Theory" for the first time. One of the students in th...
4 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.