Darwinian Conservatism by Larry Arnhart

Traditionalist conservatives and classical liberals need Charles Darwin. They need him because a Darwinian science of human nature supports Burkean conservatives and Lockean liberals in their realist view of human imperfectibility, and in their commitment to ordered liberty as rooted in natural desires, cultural traditions, and prudential judgments. Arnhart's email address is larnhart1@niu.edu.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Westermarck and Incest Laws

›
I have written a number of posts on Edward Westermarck's Darwinian theory of the incest taboo, one of which can be found here . Westerma...
Thursday, March 26, 2009

A Revised Book Project: "Natural Right and Biology"

›
After receiving suggestions from various people and thinking more about it myself, I now have a revised version of my book project-- NATURAL...
7 comments:
Sunday, March 22, 2009

Nietzsche and "Morality as Animal"

›
My new book project will probably have to include a chapter on Friedrich Nietzsche, because Nietzsche was one of the first philosophers to t...
7 comments:
Saturday, March 21, 2009

"Natural Right and Biology"--A Book Project

›
This week, I have been celebrating my appointment as a "Presidential Research Professor" at Northern Illinois University, which wi...
2 comments:

Darwin at the University of Chicago's Basic Program Retreat

›
The Basic Program in the Liberal Arts at the University of Chicago is a "great books" program that was originally established by R...
Sunday, March 15, 2009

Insect Politics

›
Ant farms don't seem to be as popular today with young boys as they were when I was a boy. There were plastic ant farms that allowed ant...
Sunday, March 08, 2009

Shadia Drury on Aquinas's Betrayal of Natural Law

›
Shadia Drury is a professor of political philosophy at the University of Regina in Canada. She is best known for her criticisms of Leo Stra...
4 comments:
Saturday, February 28, 2009

The Yuck Factor and the Evolution of Moral Disgust

›
Conservatives often appeal to moral emotions such as disgust and anger as important for moral judgment. One example is conveyed in a phrase ...
2 comments:
Friday, February 20, 2009

Darwinian Natural Right in Primitive Law

›
My conception of Darwinian natural right includes an account of law. A full account of social order requires a nested hierarchy of three kin...
Saturday, February 14, 2009

Adam Gopnik on Darwin and Lincoln

›
It is a remarkable coincidence that Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln were born on the same day 200 years ago--February 12, 1809. In some p...
1 comment:
Friday, February 06, 2009

Debating Darwin at Forbes.com

›
The bicentennial of Darwin's birth has brought lots of media attention to the continuing debate over the scientific, moral, political, a...
1 comment:
Saturday, January 31, 2009

Evolutionary Psychology's Slow Acceptance of Darwinian Morality

›
One sign of the radical character of Charles Darwin's ideas is that even some of his strongest supporters have rejected much of his thin...
1 comment:
Friday, January 23, 2009

Evolution and Thomistic Natural Law: A Reply to Stephen Pope

›
I have often argued that a Darwinian view of evolved human nature supports traditional natural law reasoning, particularly as developed by T...
Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Another Response from John Lemos

›
John Lemos has sent me the following response to my last blog post on his comments. "When I say that I have no special interest in defi...

Barack Obama Is No Abraham Lincoln

›
For a couple of months now, we have been told that Barack Obama's First Inaugural Address was going to be comparable to Abraham Lincoln...
2 comments:
Monday, January 19, 2009

Another Reply to Lemos

›
I have posted John Lemos' response to my earlier comments on his book Commonsense Darwinism . In reading his response, a few thoughts c...
Sunday, January 18, 2009

John Lemos on the Good Human Life

›
Recently, I wrote a blog post responding to John Lemos' new book Commonsense Darwinism . He has written a reply, and he has given me per...
Saturday, January 17, 2009

Is Human Nature a Superstition? A Response to David Buller

›
Over the past twenty years, evolutionary psychology has become remarkably influential, particularly among psychologists and anthropologists....
4 comments:
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.