tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post2145681838902603452..comments2024-03-28T08:57:53.180+00:00Comments on Darwinian Conservatism by Larry Arnhart: Monogamous Pair-Bonding in the Lockean State of NatureLarry Arnharthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14619785331100785170noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-8746262091062414862015-07-15T14:18:07.048+01:002015-07-15T14:18:07.048+01:00I understand Darwinian conservatism as a fusion of...I understand Darwinian conservatism as a fusion of traditionalist conservatism and classical liberalism. So my conservatism is a very liberal conservatism. I have also written some posts on "Aristotelian liberalism"--like that defended by Douglas Rasmussen and Douglas Den Uyl. I have no way of knowing how many of my readers agree with this.Larry Arnharthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14619785331100785170noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-87659939767770559312015-07-15T13:54:24.850+01:002015-07-15T13:54:24.850+01:00Larry,
You seem to attract a readership (just bas...Larry,<br /><br />You seem to attract a readership (just based off blog comments) with a strong, perhaps even radical, libertarian bent. Philosophically, in fact, many of these readers appear much more at home with Ayn Rand than your touchstone, Aristotle. <br /><br />I know you've written on why "Conservatism" is the most appropriate way to describe your take on Darwin, but do you think your readers intuit your arguments through this lens? <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-54923080426368544812015-07-15T05:48:06.925+01:002015-07-15T05:48:06.925+01:00Excellent read. It helps round out some of my arg...Excellent read. It helps round out some of my arguments regarding human nature, particularly with respect to the paleoanthropological origins of marriage.<br />byffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08117552061722777175noreply@blogger.com