tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post7441208378373072047..comments2024-03-28T08:57:53.180+00:00Comments on Darwinian Conservatism by Larry Arnhart: Revising POLITICAL QUESTIONSLarry Arnharthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14619785331100785170noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-64111942623193921932008-10-14T20:27:00.000+01:002008-10-14T20:27:00.000+01:00Though I've never taught from this book, I read it...Though I've never taught from this book, I read it as an undergraduate and learned a great deal. I think the book would benefit from chapters on Mill (or Bentham and Mill) and Edmund Burke.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-44336995120617317912008-10-08T19:00:00.000+01:002008-10-08T19:00:00.000+01:00I'm obviously biased, but I think a chapter on Rot...I'm obviously biased, but I think a chapter on Rothbard and Nozick would be a good idea.Davidhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15048385218047191192noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-79858408268148456032008-10-07T21:08:00.000+01:002008-10-07T21:08:00.000+01:00Political Questions is a marvelous book. I've lear...Political Questions is a marvelous book. I've learned a great deal from it, and I always recommend it to students just getting interested in the subject.<BR/>I suggest adding two authors: Montesquieu and Tocqueville. They are both important and original, and especially challenging for the tyro.Kent Guidahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00119882444127499607noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-48008066265544756902008-10-07T17:56:00.000+01:002008-10-07T17:56:00.000+01:00Yes. Anthony de Jasay.See:The legacy of John Rawls...Yes. Anthony de Jasay.<BR/><BR/>See:<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.depressedmetabolism.com/2008/09/11/the-legacy-of-john-rawls/" REL="nofollow">The legacy of John Rawls</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com