tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post6693470585435462318..comments2024-03-15T19:54:18.063+00:00Comments on Darwinian Conservatism by Larry Arnhart: Thinking About Galapagos (6): Animal Mating, Marriage, and ParentingLarry Arnharthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14619785331100785170noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-5224429657679366232017-03-09T23:33:35.208+00:002017-03-09T23:33:35.208+00:00In Robert Ardrey’s The Social Contract: A Personal...In Robert Ardrey’s The Social Contract: A Personal Inquiry into the Evolutionary Sources of Order and Disorder, he provides numerous examples of a significant number of animals who are capable of ecologically literate procreation; i.e. animal-cultural-consciously or genetic-unconsciously choosing to practice family planning: control or restrict their breeding with regard to abundance or scarcity of their resource environment; such as Norway rats, red grouse; Australian magpie; Uganda kob antelope; wildebeest, waterbuck, Grant’s & Thomson’s gazelle; southern springbok, hartebeest, topi, puku, oribi, dik-dick, steenbok, lion, kittiwake; etc.<br /><br />EoP: Re: WiP Conservatism and Liberalism et al<br /><br />If your ‘conservatism’ has no buck stops here concern for establishing a legal social contract that legally conserves your nations resources; upon which all of life’s species rely upon for survival and sustenance; in accordance with ecological carrying capacity limits; by requiring your nation’s citizens to restrict their procreation and/or consumption to below ecological carrying capacity limits; then your ‘conservatism’ efforts to pretend to be concerned about conserving any other religious, racial or class cultural values is akin to farting against thunder. Put simply: If your conservatism is not about conserving the ecological carrying capacity resource foundations upon which all of life reside; your ‘conservatism’ ain’t nothing but fuck honour bullshit the public relations image management vote welfare bribery.” <br /><br />Of course the same could be said for WiP liberalism, socialism, communism, nationalism, monarchism, progressivism, capitalism, racial powerism, Nazism, Zionism, Pan Africanism, etc. <br /><br /><br />EoP New Rules or WiP No Rules Los Pepes Negotiations: <br /><br />‘If Wilson was right that competition occurs only when overcrowded numbers struggle for a scarce resources, then Malthus is confirmed; and humanity has little to look forward to but that chaotic day when in unlimited number we assassinate one another in our pursuit of inadequate resources. But if Wynne-Edwards is right, any population, human or non-human, has within its power the limitation of numbers through conventional rules and regulations and the capacity to abide by them.” – Ardrey quoted in EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations infographic: <a href="http://ig.tygae.org.za/16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract/" rel="nofollow">16-08-16_vputineopwipsocialcontract</a>. <br /><br />EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations focus is to ascertain whether anyone is interested in cooperating to 'turn off the tap' -- i.e. the breeding / consumption above ecological carrying capacity limits -- causes of war; by implementing an Ecology of Peace New World Order international law social contract; that requires all the worlds citizens of all races and religions to procreate and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; enabling humane and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation return to ecological carrying capacity limits. <br /><br />A copy of this comment shall be posted at eop-v-wip.tygae.org.za <br />EoP MILED Clerkhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08110619015526424456noreply@blogger.com