tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post1498623992779965118..comments2024-03-28T08:57:53.180+00:00Comments on Darwinian Conservatism by Larry Arnhart: Is Monogamy for the Birds?Larry Arnharthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14619785331100785170noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-47908073742723262672017-04-14T22:54:21.683+01:002017-04-14T22:54:21.683+01:00I would also like to see Prof. Arnhart discuss the...I would also like to see Prof. Arnhart discuss the arguments presented by Anon above.Narcisohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08017770745142918762noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16355954.post-30636817869552777122017-01-25T17:33:43.851+00:002017-01-25T17:33:43.851+00:00You're still insisting on "natural homose...You're still insisting on "natural homosexuality" despite never addressing the arguments presented here:<br />https://darwinianreactionary.wordpress.com/2014/01/17/the-myth-of-sexual-orientation/<br />and here:<br />https://jaymans.wordpress.com/2014/02/26/greg-cochrans-gay-germ-hypothesis-an-exercise-in-the-power-of-germs/<br /><br />As always, you're a Darwinian of convenience.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com